Why Outsource Payroll?
Whether or not
you choose a PEO or payroll service provider, it rarely makes
sense to keep payroll in house. Payroll is a necessary
function of employing people, but it does not help create
revenue or increase sales. Simply put, payroll is a drain
on most employers' resources because it is a non revenue
generating process.
The most common
argument I've heard for keeping payroll in house usually center
around control. Control of the check timing, the tax
payments, etc. This argument is counter productive to the
better kind of control- control over marketing and growth.
The fact is that most employers who actually do outsource
payroll are relieved to have it off their desk or the desk of
someone else in their office.
It should not
surprise anyone reading this, but most employees would rather do
anything else than focus on bottom line activities such as
sales, collections, marketing, etc. The more functions
they can find to avoid the more challenging tasks the better.
Revenue generating functions take energy and can create
confrontation or rejection. So employees find other tasks
to avoid the ones that matter most. The simple solutions
for employers is to remove as many of these avoidance functions
as possible.
The age old adage
applies here. Would you rather save a dime or make
a buck? If you would prefer to arguably save a
small amount of money by holding onto to payroll in house than
outsourcing is likely not for you. Conversely, if you
recognize the value of your time or your employees' time and the
opportunity costs associated with holding on to non revenue
generating employer related activities, than outsourcing should
be the only solution that makes good sense.
The Evolution of Payroll
Service Bureaus
Payroll only
providers used to be considered a bland commodity, they all
pretty much did the same thing- basic payroll processing and tax
management. As PEOs increased the competitive playing
field and technology made it easier to offer new services such
as benefits and insurance, payroll companies began providing
more value adding solutions to their programs.
Today it can be
difficult to spot the difference between payroll companies,
ASOs, HROs, and PEOs. Many of them can operate in multiple
environments depending on what a customer wants or needs.
It is, however, worth mentioning that a PEO relationship is the
only co-employment relationship that can provide some of the
solutions to unique employer problems I discussed in the section
on when PEOs
can be the right fit.
The fact is that
PEOs typically have a higher administration fee than other
payroll service organizations. That said, their
administration fees may be offset if they can reduce costs in
other areas of operating costs such as workers compensation,
benefits, HR, or unemployment tax.
Comparing PEO vs. Payroll
Costs
The way to
determine which type of relationship makes the most sense for
your business is to net out all of the expenses associated with
a few qualified PEOs and payroll providers and then compare them
to you current employer costs or estimated costs.
Here is a brief example of employer related costs for a
typical service business:
|
FICA TAX
|
7.65%
|
Same for
PEO and Employers
|
|
FUTA TAX
|
.80%
|
Same for
PEO and Employers
|
|
SUTA TAX
|
3.00%
|
Varies by
State and Employer Reserve Ratio
|
|
WORK COMP
(per code)
|
$7.25
|
Varies by
State and Employer Experience Rate
|
|
ADMINSTRATION
(Benefits, HR,
Etc.)
|
1% - 3%
|
Varies by
PEO and Employer Circumstances
Includes Cost of Personnel, Labor, Payroll, etc.
Difficult to Quantify for Employers-
See Analysis Tool
|
|
TOTAL
(at 3%)
|
21.70%
|
Example
cost of PEO. Compare to payroll costs and/or your
current employer costs for each component
|
|
|
|
Suggestions for making comparisons
1. Quantify your current employer related costs in a
similar format
2. Multiple gross payroll times PEO admin fee to
determine tue PEOs service charge.
Keep in mind PEOs and payroll providers may earn revenue in
other areas such as insurance.
3. Credit savings to PEO for a) lower work comp rates,
b) lower SUTA rate, c) value of services
4. Compare hard cost of administration charge to other
payroll quotes and internal costs
5. Make an informed decision based on the overall
cost/benefit analysis
|
|
Notes
* FUTA/SUTA taxes cut-off at certain wage base limits
and PEOs should recognize cut-offs
|
Our agency owns
and operates our own
payroll company and
insurance brokerage and often integrate many of the same
programs as PEOs including Pay As You Go Workers Compensation,
General Liability, Benefits, and HR tools. Our preference
is to help our customers understand all available options
including PEO, ASO, payroll outsourcing, and standard insurance
options. We do not operate our own PEO Program.
|
|

|